From all the furniture forms, the chair may be the imperative one. While most of the other items (save for the bed) are created to support objects, the chair supports our human form. The term chair was said here in the general sense, from stool to throne to developed forms such as the bench and sofa, which might be looked upon as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not evidently labeled.
The social history of the chair is as intriguing as its history as an art and craft. The chair is not simply a physical support or an aesthetic artwork; it is historically a signifier of social status. At the old royal courts there were social distinctions between sitting on a chair with arms, or a chair with a back but no arms, or worse having to squat on a stool. During the last century, the director’s and/or manager’s chair has been an identifier of superior position, and in democratic parliaments the speaker sits on an elevated floor.
As its furniture form, the chair can be employed for a number of different forms. There are chairs structured to fit man’s age and physical condition (the high chair, the wheelchair) and for his status in society (the executive chair, the throne). Since historical days there were chairs used for birthing (birth chairs); from the 20th century, there have been chairs for ending life (the electric chair). We design chairs with one, two, three, or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We can have chairs that can be folded and put away, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our contemporary lifestyle has derived particular chairs in automobiles and aircraft. All these chair kinds has changed to suit to changing human desires. Because of its unique relationship with man, the chair comes to its full importance only when being used. Though it isn’t relevant to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a set of drawers if there is anything inside or not, a chair is really seen and fairly judged with a person using it, because chair and sitter need each other. Thus the individual parts of a chair were labeled as the names of a human shape: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the principal role of the chair is to support a body, its credit is evaluated basically by how fully it fulfills this practical purpose. In the creation of a chair, the maker is limited by certain static regulations and principal measurements. Inside these rules, however, the chair maker has awesome freedom.
The history of the chair extends over dates of several thousand years. There are civilizations that created iconic chair types, as expressive of the highest object in the spheres of technique and design. Among such peoples, individual mention can be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lives of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the items of expert design, are today a finding from findings made in tombs. One of these two is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The iconic Egyptian chair had four legs formed like those of an animal, a curved seat, and leading to a sloping back supported over vertical stretchers. From this design a stable triangular form was crafted. There was in our knowledge no notable variation in the creation of Egyptian thrones and chairs for ordinary populace. The general difference exists in the intricacy of ornamentation, in the particulars of expensive inlays. The Egyptian folding stool probably was crafted for an easily carried seat for soldiers. As a camp stool that stool persisted until much later points. But the stool then was designed as the use of a ceremonial seat, its mechanical history as a folding stool neglected or forgotten. This can now be found, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, executed in ebony with ivory inlay decoration and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are made in the structure of folding stools but are not able to be folded because the seats are made from wood. The simple make of the folding stool, made of two frames that spin on metal bolts and hold a seat of leather or fabric set between them, came again somewhat later from the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The most recognisable of those is the folding stool, made of ashwood, which can now be seen at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The unique Greek chair, the klismos, is recognised not from any ancient fossil still extant but in a wealth of pictorial material. The better known is the klismos placed on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial location by Athens (c. 410 BC). This klismos is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of these legs are displayed. These curving legs were most likely manufactured from bent wood and were in that case had to bear a large amount of pressure with the weight of the sitter. The joints attaching the legs to the frame of the seat would have been therefore very stable and were particularly drawn.
The Romans embued the Greek design; designs of models of seated Romans offer chairs of a denser and in appearance rather more crudely designed klismos. Both features, the light or heavy, were brought back in the Classicist epoch. The klismos chair is used in French Empire styles, in English Regency, and in particular brands of considerable uniqueness of Denmark and Sweden circa 1800.
China
The past of the chair in China cannot be charted as well as the ancestry of chairs in Egypt and Greece. Since the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unbroken collection of images and works of art was preserved, with images of the interior and exterior of Chinese homes and the kinds of furniture. Kept also of the 16th century are a number of chairs crafted of wood or lacquered wood, that show an interesting likeness to images of ancient chairs.
Just as in Egypt, two chair forms dominated in China: a chair with four legs and a folding stool. This four-legged chair is found both with and without arms however never missing its square seat and straight stiles (standing side supports) to hold up the back. In one image, it has been seen, the stiles were lightly curved over the arms so as to sit correctly with the form of the S-shaped back splat (the main upright of the back). The three areas are mortised onto the yoke-like top rail. Though the design of a back splat then had an introduction for English chairs of the Queen Anne period, wooden sections that merely to a particular limit support corner joints (and are loose to top it off) are a signature particular to Chinese chairs. The four legs pass through the seat frame, which stops around the rounded staves. All members are round in section or have rounded edges—referable perchance to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not comfortable and may have had a plaited texture. These chairs required the sitter to stay stiff and upright; when too much pressure is pushed on the back, the chair has a habit of toppling over. In patriarchal Chinese homes of this period armchairs presumably were allowed only for the senior individuals, for they were respected greatly.
The Chinese folding stool is believed to have travelled to China from the West. It does not differ very much from the Egyptian or Scandinavian folding stools, but it has a change in that the top rail is elegantly affixed to the two legs of the stool by use of a curved member, which is usually seen with metal mounts. From a Western point of view the resultant effect of these two furniture designs is stylized. The structure and decoration parts are combined in a manner that is both naïve and refined. The piecemeal appearance is an outcome of the fact that the individual items do not look to have been fixed together by use of either glue or screws, but are mortised with one another and held in place in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain in the 17th century also put its mark on the chair. Works of art display a design of chair with a relatively unrefined wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, consisting of two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing between, stitched to bring up a pattern of tiny pads. The front board and a similar board in the back could be folded after unscrewing some tiny iron hooks. Therefore the chair was a readily portable piece of furniture while traveling which, during the same time, gave the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered style of chair can be evidenced in engravings of interiors of wealthy Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and also in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Though this style of chair may also be made in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won acclaim, it is not determined that the form actually was instigated in The Netherlands. Usually, the legs of the chair were smooth, round in section, and of slim shape; they are occasionally baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is unquestionably a bourgeois piece of furniture and was produced in vast quantities, as can be surmised from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is a row of this kind of chairs lined up by a wall. The form asserts itself by its elegant proportions and delicate upholstery in gilt leather or fabric edged with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature form—that was, as brought out in Paris around 1750—disseminated over most of Europe and was imitated or copied during the mid-20th century. The chair owes the popularity to a combination of leisure and elegance. The seat conforms to the human body and permits a relaxed sitting position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Generally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are little upholstered pads over the armrests. Smooth transitions are made between seat frame, legs, and back cover all the joints, which are constructed solidly on craftsmanlike methodology even with the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations thereof are made from wood of quite thick density; but all members are deeply molded, all extraneous wood has been taken away, and more expensive examples can be further embellished with very delicate and decorative carving. The wood might be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is usually used for the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; cane is in some cases used instead of upholstery.
English chairs in the 18th century were more differentiated in design than the French. The French touch for stylistic uniformity, which came from the premier circles in Paris and Versailles throughout most of France and became the favourite in several parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became reknowned and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
In the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper products of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, purport that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office furniture in Sydney contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.
Sphere: Related Content