Shadow Squadron

Taxes are distinguished by the effect they have on the distribution of income and wealth. A proportional tax is a tax that applies the same relative liability on each taxpayer—i.e., where tax liability and income grow in the same levels. A progressive tax is characterized by a larger than proportional rise in the tax burden relative to the growth in income, and a regressive tax is recognised by a less than proportional growth in the comparative onus. Ergo, progressive taxes are viewed as removing the lack of equality in income distribution, but regressive taxes are found to have the result of increasing these inequalities.

The taxes that are often thought to be progressive include individual income taxes and estate taxes. Income taxes that are nominally progressive, however, may become less so for the upper-income group—in particular if a taxpayer is permitted to reduce his tax base by declaring deductions or by leaving out particular income elements from his taxable income. Proportional tax rates if applied to lower-income categories will also be more progressive if personal exemptions are claimed.

Income measured over the period of a given year does not necessarily provide the most suitable measure of taxpaying requirements. For example, transitory growth in income may be saved, and during temporary declines in income a taxpayer could decide to provide for consumption by reducing savings. So, if taxation is made comparable with “permanent income,” it should be less regressive (or more progressive) than when it is compared with annual income.

Sales taxes and excises (except those on luxuries) tend to be regressive, because the share of personal income consumed or spent on specific goods decreases as the rate of personal income increases. Poll taxes (aka head taxes), nominated as a flat amount per capita, patently are regressive.

It is difficult to classify corporate income taxes and taxes on business as progressive, regressive, or proportionate, due to the lack of certainty surrounding the ability of businesses to shift their tax expenses (see below Shifting and incidence). This difficulty of nominating who bears the tax burden rests crucially on whether a national or a subnational (that is, provincial or state) tax is being debated.

In assessing the economic purposes of taxation, it is necessary to distinguish between varied concepts of tax rates. The statutory rates are dictated in law; usually these are marginal rates, but in some cases they are average rates. Marginal income tax rates signify the fraction of incremental income that is taken by taxation when income is increased by one dollar. So, if tax burden increases by 45 cents when income grows by one dollar, the marginal tax rate is 45 percent. Income tax legislature often contain graduated marginal rates—i.e., rates that increase as income grows. Structured analysis of marginal tax rates must take into account provisions as well as the formal statutory rate structure. If, for example, a particular tax credit (reduction in tax) lessens by 20 cents for each one-dollar rise in income, the marginal rate is 20 percentage points more than specified by the statutory rates. Since marginal rates display how after-tax income moves in response to changes in before-tax income, they are the necessary ones for considering incentive effects of taxation. It is even more difficult to nominate the marginal effective tax rate applied to income from business and capital, since it may be reliant on considerations including the structure of depreciation allowances, the deductibility of interest, and the provisions for inflation adjustment. A basic economic theorem holds that the marginal effective tax rate in income from capital is nothing under a consumption-based tax.

Average income tax rates indicate the part of total income that is taken in taxation. The pattern of average rates is the one that is in consideration for assessing the distributional equity of taxation. Under a progressive income tax the average income tax rate rises with income. Average income tax rates commonly increase with income, both because personal allowances are permitted for the taxpayer and dependents and because marginal tax rates are graduated; on the flip side, preferential treatment of income received fundamentally by high-income households might swamp these effects, allowing regressivity, as signified by average tax rates that fall as income increases.

For MYOB Brisbane expert advice, contact Stone Consulting today. Stone Consulting also runs MYOB training in Brisbane.